Assessment of uranium favorability for the crystalline rocks of the Wind River Range, Wyoming

Stuckless, John S.- jstuckless@usgs.gov, Van Trump, George · 1983 · Report

The Wind River Range, western Wyoming (fig. 1), is a north-trending uplift of Precambrian crystalline rocks flanked by younger sedimentary rock.

This 1983 document, Assessment of uranium favorability for the crystalline rocks of the Wind River Range, Wyoming, is preserved in the Mountain Man Mining Library for research and reference. Original source: pubs.usgs.gov.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Assessment of Uranium Favorability for the Crystalline Rocks of the Wind River Range, Wyoming by J. S. Stuckless and G. VanTrump, Jr, Open-File Report 83-323 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigrahic nomenclature. Any use of trade names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the USGS.

INTRODUCTION The Wind River Range, western Wyoming (fig. 1), is a north-trending uplift of Precambrian crystalline rocks flanked by younger sedimentary rock. The crystalline core is a complex of amphibolite-to granulite-facies metamorphic rocks and at least two major groups of plutonic rocks. The older plutonic rocks are characterized by the Louis Lake batholith (Bayley, 1965a, b) which is composed largely of equigranular quartz diorite and granodiorite with minor amounts of quartz monzonite (K. K. Cheang, D. B. Wenner, and J. S. tuckless, unpub. data). This unit is the dominant crystalline rock at the southern end of the range and has been dated by the U-Pb zircon method as 2642 ± 9 Ma old* (Naylor and others, 1970). The younger plutonic rock is more granitic in composition and is typically porphyritic. It has been dated near the northeastern corner of the Popo Agie Primitive Area by the U-Pb zircon method as 2562 + 75 Ma old 1 (Naylor and others, 1970). These authors refer to the unit as the Bears Ears pluton; however rocks of similar composition and texture have been referred to as the Popo Agie batholith in the Popo Agie Wilderness (Pearson and others, 1971) and the Middle Mountain batholith in the Fitzpatrick Wilderness (Granger and others, 1971). There are several producing uranium districts in Wyoming (Butler, 1972), but no known igneous or metamorphic deposits of uranium, thorium, or rareearth elements. However, granitic rocks within Wyoming have been shown to be likely source-rocks for the major sandstone-hosted uranium deposits (Seeland, 1976; Stuckless and Nkomo, 1978). Furthermore, granitic rocks in the Owl Creek Mountains (approximately 180 km northeast of Lander) host large, lowgrade secondary uranium deposits (Yellich, 1978) which apparently developed in *Ages recalculated by Ludwig and Stuckless (1978) using decay constants recommended by the IUGS Subcommission on Geochronology (Steiger and Jager, 1977).

response to early Tertiary uplift and erosion (Nkomo and others, 1978). Shannon (1979) has suggested that similar deposits may exist within the crystalline rock of the Wind River Range. However, the special geologic setting described by Yellich (1978) of highly fractured and brecciated crystalline rocks with hydrocarbons migrating upwards is not known to exist within the Wind River Range. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES Thirty four granitic rock samples and 12 metamorphic rock samples were collected in the Bridger Wilderness to evaluate radioelement favorability within the crystalline rocks. An additional 44 granite samples were collected from areas adjacent to the Wilderness. A statistical evaluation of the geochemical data indicates that there is no difference between granitic rocks within and as compared to those outside of the Wilderness and therefore, the combined results are presented for granitic rocks in order to use the larger and more statistically significant data base. Uranium and thorium concentrations (Table 1) were determined by the delayed neutron method (MiHard, 1976) which has an average accuracy of ± 4 percent, and ± 10 percent for these elements, respectively. The concentrations of potassium (eK), thorium (eTh), and RaeU (radium equivalent uranium which is the amount of uranium needed for secular equilibrium with measured radium) were determined by gamma-ray spectrometry (Bunker and Bush, 1966, 1967). Average accuracies for concentrations reported in Table 1 are ± 2 percent. Yttrium, rubidium and strontium concentrations (Table 1) were determined by X-ray fluorescence and are generally accurate within ± 6 percent. Trace-element data for the granitic samples are best represented by a log-normal distribution as judged from skewness and kurtosis of the

untransformed as compared to the logarithmetically transformed data. Therefore, means and standard deviations were calculated from the logarithms of the data and are reported as antilogs (Table 2). Statistical evaluation of the data was accomplished by use of the USGS RASS-STATPAC computer system (VanTrump and Miesch, 1977). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The range in values for concentration and ratios reported in Table 2 are very large for both the granitic plutonic and metamorphic rocks; however, mean values are not markedly different from those reported for average granite (Table 2). Furthermore neither uranium nor thorium contents approach within an order of magnitude of ore grade in any sample (Table 1) which suggests that none of the analyzed samples has been subjected to ore-forming processes. The probability of an economic deposit of these elements in either the igneous or metamorphic rocks is considered to be very low. This conclusion is supported by trace element and other available data. Intra-granitic uranium and thorium deposits are generally associated with highly evolved granites (for example, LeRoy, 1978). Granites associated with uranium or thorium deposits are typified by high Rb/Sr ratios (generally greater than 5), low K/Rb ratios (generally less than 125), and abnormally high rare-earth element and yttrium contents. None of these features is present within the granites of the Bridger Wilderness (Table 2). In fact the average yttrium content of the granitic samples is only 1/3 that of an average granite. In addition, oxygen isotope data for the Louis Lake batholith (K. K. Cheang, D. B. Wenner, and J. S. Stuckless, unpub. data) show that at least this granite was derived from an unevolved source material.

Potassium-rubidium-strontium data also show subtle but significant differences between the plutonic rocks of the Wind River Range and plutonic rocks of the Granite Mountains and Owl Creek Mountains (fig. 2). The average K/Rb ratios for granitic rocks of the Granite Mountains and Owl Creek Mountains are 276 and 188, respectively, distinctly lower than the 324 calculated for granitic rocks of the Wind River Range (Table 2). Similarly, average Rb/Sr ratios are 2.84 and 1.88 for plutonic rocks of the Granite Mountains and Owl Creek Mountains which is 3.5 to 5 times greater than the 0.55 calculated for the plutonic rocks of the Wind River Range. Thus the granitic rocks of the Wind River Range are not as evolved as granites elsewhere in Wyoming that are associated with uranium depoits. In fact the plutonic rocks of the Wind River Range follow a trend similar to that defined by rocks of the Sierra Nevada batholith (fig. 2) for which the average Rb/Sr and K/Rb ratios are 0.50 and 358 respectively, and Sierra Nevada rocks are not known to be associated with uranium deposits. Average values of Th/U and K/U are anomalously large relative to average granite. The average value of Th/K is only slightly high. These feature suggest some uranium loss either from the protolith prior to magma generation or from the plutons during the magmatic history or in response to exposure to surficial conditions. A magmatic loss of uranium might give rise to pegmatitic uranium deposits whereas a more geologically recent loss could provide a source for sediment-hosted deposits such as those around the Granite Mountains to the east (Stuckless and Nkomo, 1978). The low RaeU/U ratio for the granitic rocks indicate at least some geologically recent uranium loss (Stuckless and Ferreira, 1976). However, preliminary isotopic studies (Stuckless, unpublished data) show only slight excesses of radiogenic 206 Pb relative to 238U. Thus only minor uranium

occurrences might reasonably be expected such as the one about 60 km southeast of Pinedale (Butler, 1972). It is not therefore surprising that sediments in the western Wind River Basin, which were derived from the Wind River Range (Seeland, 1978) contain no known uranium deposits. If recent uranium losses from the plutonic rocks are small, the large Th/U and K/U averages suggest uranium loss during the magmatic or protolith history of the plutons. No radioactive pegmatites have been noted during field studies of the region. Thus if uranium was lost and reconcentrated during the magmatic stage, it probably migrated to higher level rocks which have since been removed by erosion. A loss of uranium from the protolith can not be evaluated directly; however, it is likely that any uranium lost from this source also migrated to levels above the current level of exposure. Data for the metamorphic rocks also suggest a uranium depletion, but the average RaeU/U ratio is close to unity which indicates that the loss of uranium is not recent. Uranium depletion in response to granulite facies metamorphism has been documented isotopically (Gray and Oversby, 1972; Doe and Delevaux, 1980). Loss of uranium in response to regional heating has also been reported (Killen and Heier, 1975). Inasmuch as the metamorphic rocks have been subjected to both possible causes for uranium loss, it is likely that the loss occurred prior to or during intrusion of the granite. Because pegmatites of the area are not known to be radioactive, it is likely that uranium migrated into higher crustal rocks which have since been removed by erosion. In summary, the radioelement and trace-element data suggest a low probability for uranium and thorium mineralization within the Bridger Wilderness. There is, however, some potential that the granitic rocks could have provided a source for small sediment-hosted uranium deposits to the south and west.

Table 1.--Location* concentration data* and chemical ratios for crystalline rocks from the Wind River R a n q e Wvoming. CPrefix "e" used to denote measurements by gamma-ray SDectrometr eTh/K multiplied by 10*000. eK/U divided 10/000.3 Sample BEP-1 BEP-2 BEP-3 BEP-4 BW-01 BW-02 BW-03 BW-04 8W-05 BW-06 BW-07 9W-08 8W-Q9 BW-1 0 BW-1 1 BW-1 2 9W-1 3 BW-1 4 BW-1 5 BW-1 6 BW-1 7 PW-1 R BW-1 9 BW-20 BW-21 BW-22 BW-23 BW-24 BW-25 BW-26 9W-30 BW-31 BW-32 BW-33 BW-34 BW-35 BW-36 RW-37 RW-3S BW-39 Lat i tude 42 4? 4?

% Long i t L : ude 5? U (ppm ) RaeU (ppm) Th (ppm) eTh (ppm) 5P..8 eK (wt %) '.89

Table 1.--Location* coneentration data* and chemical ratios for crystalline rocks from the Wind River Ranger Wyominq--continued. Sampl e BEP-1 3EP-2 8EP-3 BEP-4 PW-01 BW-02 BU-03 3W-04 6W-35 BW-06 8W-07 aw-CH BW-09 8W-1 0 BW-11 BW-1 2 PW-13 BW-1 4 8W-1 5 BW-1 6 BW-1 7 BW-1 8 BW-1 9 BW-20 BW-21 BW-22 8W-25 BW-24 PW-P5 BW-26 BW-30 BW-31 BW-32 BU-33 9W-34 BW-36 BW-37 3VJ-38 aw-39 Rb (ppm) 17* 7? 9? Sr (pom) 22? 53°, 1 ,510 ?87 Y (pom) ?8 eTh/U 9. "SO eTh/eK 9.Qi eK/U 1.S7 RaeU/U Rb/Sr K/Rb

Table 1. Location* concentration data/ and chemical ratios for crystalline rocks from the Wind River 3 a n g e / Wyominq--continued. Sample 3W-AO 3W-A1 3W-A2 BW-A3 RW-AA 3W-A6 3W-A7 BW-A8 BW-A9 BW-50 8W-51 GPA-01 GPA-02 GPA-03 GPA-OA GPA-05 GPA-06 GPA-07 GPA-08 GPA-QQ GPA-10 GPA-11 GPA-12 GPA-13 LLB-01 LLB-02 LLB-03 LLB-OA LLB-05 LLB-07 LLB-09 LLB-10 LLB-11 LLB-1? LLR-13 LLB-1A LLB-15 PRM-01 Lat i tude A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A? A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A3 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A? A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 A2 1A 2A 2A 2A 2A 3A A3 A3 A3 A1 A1 A1 2A 5A A3 A2 A? A2 3A A5 A5 Lonqi t tide 1 0 R 1 AO A2 A1 A1 A1 ?9 A6 AO

3A AO A2 A5 A7 SO A5 A6 A6 A6 A3 A3 A 8 A8 AS 5S A A5 A9 1A A A5 U (com) 7. A 2. A A. 2 2. A A. 9 .5 ?! 2 A. 3 6. A A. 3 RaeU (ppm) A. 7 .A .A

A. 5 Th (ppm) A5.7 A.1 A2.8 A7.3 AS. 8 11. A 13. A 2A.7 AA.9 A8.7 11 .? eTh (ppm) 77. A 23. A 16. A A9.0 A7.6 33. A A1.3 7A.O A7.1 1A.7 AA.9 A5.7 1A.1 11. A 6A.7 eK A. 18 A. 37 A. 80 A. 01 A. 33 A. 50 2.A6 A. 60 A. 20 A.A2 A. 77 1.6A A. A3 A. 09 A. 16

Table 1 .--Loc at i on# concentration data* rocks from the Wind River R a n q e and chemical ratios for crystalline Wyoming--continued. Sample RW-40 BW-41 PW-42 BW-43 BW-44 BU-46 BW-47 BW-48 RW-49 DW-50 PW-51 GPA-01 GPA-02 GPA-03 GPA-04 GPA-05 GPA-06 GPA-07 GPA-08 GPA-09 GPA-10 GPA-11 GPA-12 GPA-13 ILB-02 LLP-03 LIB- 04 LLO-05 LLR-06 LLP-07 LLB-08 LLB-09 ll.B-10 LLP-11 LLB-12 LLB-13 LLR-14 LLB-15 PR.V-Q1 . Rb (ppm) Sr ( pom) 1?o Y (pom) ?4 ?2 eTh/U pTh/eK eK/U RaeU/U

Rb/Sr K/Rb 3Q9 "

Table 1. Location* concentration data* and chemical ratios for crystalline rocks fron the Wind River Ranqe* Wyomi nq--c ont i nued . Sample Latitude Lonqitude Raell Th eTh eK (ppm) (pom) (ppm) (wt %) PRM-02 PRM-03 PRM-04 PRM-05 PRM-06 PRM-07 PRH-08 PRM-QO PRM-10 PRM-11 PRM-1? PRM-13 PRM-14 1*7 26 33 4? 29 52 109 15 16 109 1 3 10 109 13 10 4? 27 34 10* 51 103 55 37 10S 53 17 108 53 10 108 59 19 1

Table 1.--Location/ concentration data/ and chemical ratios for crystalline rocks from the Wind River R a n 3 e / Wyominq--continued. Sampl e PR, '1-02 PRwi-03 PR'4-04 PRNI-05 PRM-06 PRM-07 PRM-08 ORM-09 PRM-10 PRM- 1 1 PRP-12 PRM-13 PRM-14 Rb (oorr) 8? Sr (ppm) 76 33? Y ?0

eTh/U ?.56 eTh/eK 1.7* ?.26 eK/U 3.0? RaeU/U Rb/Sr K/Rb ?94

+ + + 28.3 + + 11.45 + + + 14.9 + +116 + Table 2.--Summary of Radioelement and selected Trace-element concentrations and ratios for granitic and metamorphic rocks from the Wind River Range, Wyoming. [N is the number of samples. Average granitic values for radioelements and ratios are from Stuckless and VanTrump (1982). Average Y, average Rb to average Sr, and average K to average Rb are from Krauskoff (1967). Leaders (---) indicate no reported value.] Standard Deviation +a -a

Th/U

Rb/Sr K/Rb RaeU/U

Th/U Th/KxlO4 K/UxlO'4

Rb/Sr K/Rb RaeU/U

Th/U

Rb/Sr K/Rb Minimum Value Maximum Value Mean Value Granitic Plutonic Rocks (N=77)

Metamorphic Rocks Average Granite

(N=12) Values + + + 32.6 + + 10.1 + 10.3 + + 18.2 + +122 + , - 5.6

110° 109° 43< APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY OF BRIDGER WILDERNESS AREA APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY OF FITZPATRICK WILDERNESS AREA APPROXIMATE BOUNDARY OF POPO AGIE PRIMITIVE AREA Ml KM Figure l.--Map with the location of the Wind River Range and wilderness areas. The approximate area sampled for this study is shown by shading,

K/100 (ppm) Wind River Range Rb (ppm) Sr (ppm) K/100 (ppm) Owl Creek Mts Rb (ppm) ,40 Sr (ppm) K/100 (ppm) Granite Mts Sierra Nevada Mts K/100 (ppm) Sr (ppm) Rb (ppm) Sr (ppm) Rb (ppmf Figure 2.--Ternary diagrams for the relative proportions of potassium, rubidium and strontium in granitic rocks from the Wind River Range (this report), the Owl Creek Mountains (Stuckless and others, unpub. data) the Granite Mountains (Stuckless and Miesch, 1981), and the Sierra Nevada Mountains (Dodge and others, 1982)

REFERENCES CITED Bayley, R. W., 1965a, Geologic map of the Miners Delight quadrangle, Fremont County, Wyoming: U.S. Geological Survey Quadrangle Map GQ-460. Bayley, R. W., 1965b, Geologic map of the Louis Lake quadrangle, Fremont County, Wyoming: U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-461. Bunker, C. M., and Bush, C. A., 1966, Uranium, thorium, and radium analyses by gamma-ray spectrometry (0.184-0.3521 million electron volts), in Geological Survey Research 1966: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 550-B, p. B176-B181. Bunker, C. M., and Bush, C. A., 1967, A comparison of potassium analyses by gamma-ray spectrometry and other techniques, in Geological Survey Research 1967: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 575-B, B164-B169. Butler, A. P., Jr., 1972, Uranium, JJT_ Ma 1 lory, W. W., ed., Geologic Atlas of the Rocky Mountain Region: Rocky Mountain Association Geologists, p. 315-317. Dodge, F. C. W., Mi Hard, H. T., Jr., and Elsheimer, H. N., 1982, Compositional variations and abundances of selected elements in granitoid rocks and constituent minerals, central Sierra Nevada batholith, California: U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1248, 24 p. Doe, B. R., and Delewaux, M. H., 1980, Lead-isotope investigations in the Minnesota River Valley-late-tectonic and posttectonic granites: Geological Society of America Special Paper 1823, p. 105-112. Granger, H. C., McKay, E. J., Mattick, R. E., Patten, L. L., and Macllroy, Paul, 1971, Mineral resources of the Glacier Primative Area, Wyoming: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1319-F, 113 p.

Gray, C. M. and Oversby, V. M., 1972, The behavior of lead isotopes during granulite facies metamorphism: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 36, p. 939-952. Killeen, P. G., and Heier, K. S., 1975, A uranium and thorium enriched province of the Fennoscandia Shield in southern Norway: Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta., v. 39, p. 1525-1524. Krauskopf, K. B., 1967, Introduction to geochemistry: McGray-Hill, Inc., 721 p. Leroy, Jacques, 1978, The Margnac and Fanay uranium deposits of the LaCrouzille District (western Massif Central, France): Geologic and Fluid inclusion studies: Economic Geology, v. 73, p. 1611-1634. Ludwig, K. R. and Stuckless, J. S., 1978, Uranium-lead isotope systematics and apparent ages of zircons and other minerals in Precambrain granitic rocks, Granite Mountains, Wyoming: Contributions Mineralogy Petrology v. 65, p. 243-254. Mi Hard, H. T., Jr., 1976, Determinations of uranium and thorium in USGS standard rocks by the delayed neutron technique, J_n_U.S. Geological Survey Professional paper 840, p. 61-65. Nkomo, I. T., Stuckless, J. S., Thaden, R. E., and Rosholt, J. N., 1978, Petrology and uranium mobility of an early Precambrian granite from the Owl Creek Mountains, Wyoming: Thi rtieth Annual Field Conference-1978 Wyoming Geologic Association Guidebook p. 335-348. Naylor, R. S., Steiger, R. H., and Wasserburg, G. J., 1970, U-Th-Pb systematics in 2700 x 10 -year old plutons from the southern Wind River Range, Wyoming: Geochimica et. Cosmochimica Acta, v. 34, p. 1133-1159.

Pearson, R. C., Kiilsgaard, T. H., Patten, L. L., and Mattich, R. E., 1971, Mineral resources of the Popo Agie Primitive Area, Fremont and Sublette Counties, Wyoming: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1353-B, 55 p. Seeland, D. A., 1976, Relationship between early Tertiary sedimentation patterns and uranium mineralization in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming: Twenty-Eighth Annual Field Conference - 1976 Wyoming Geological Association Guidebook, p. 53-64. Seeland, D. A., 1978, Sedimentology and stratigraphy of the lower Eocene Wind River Formation, central Wyoming: Thirtieth Annual Field Conference - 1978 Wyoming Geological Association Guidebook, p. 181-198. Shannon, S. S., Jr., 1979, Uranium hydrogeochemical and stream sediment reconnaisance of the Lander NTMS Quadrangle Wyoming: National Uranium Resource Evolution Project, GJBX-147, 172 p. Steiger, R. H., and Jager, E., 1977, Subcommission geochronology: Convention on the use of decay constants in geo-and cosmochronology: Earth Planetary Science Letters, v. 36, p. 359-362. Stuckless, J. S., and Ferreira, C. P., 1976, Labile uranium in granitic rocks, in International Symposium on Exploration of Uranium Ore Deposits, Proc. Symposium: Internation Atomic Energy Agency, 1976, Vienna, p. 717-730. Stuckless, J. S., and Miesch, A. T., 1981, Petrogenetic modeling of a potential uranium source rock, Granite Mountains, Wyoming: USGS Professional Paper #1225, 39 p. Stuckless, J. S., and Nkomo, I. T., 1978, Uranium-lead isotope systematics in Uraniferous alkali-rich granites from the Granite Mountains, Wyoming: Implications for uranium source rocks: Economic Geology, v. 73, p. 417-441.

Stuckless, J. S. and VanTrump, G. , Jr., 1982, A compilation of radioelement concentrations in granitic rocks of the contiguous United States: proceedings of the IAEA/OECD Symposium on Uranium Exploration Methods, p. 191-208. VanTrump, George, Jr., and Miesch, A. T., 1977, The U.S. Geological Survey RASS-STATPAC system for management and statistical reduction of geochemical data: Computers and Geosciences, p. 475-488. Yellich, J. A., Cramer, R. T., and Kendall, R. G., 1978, Copper Mountain, Wyoming, uranium deposit-rediscovered: Thirtieth Annual Field Conference- -1978 Wyoming Geological Association Guidebook, p. 311-327.